All Hokie, All the Time. Period. Presented by

Conference Realignment Board

VTHokie2000

Joined: 01/01/2005 Posts: 33818
Likes: 12458


I don't disagree that BYU is a "better fit" for the Pac-12


However, if the latest expansion was TV market driven, then is the state of Utah a big enough market that requires 2 teams or is 1 enough? Also, is 2 UT teams more valuable than 1 UT and 1 CO team? For the record, I am not say that the Pac-12 necessarily made the "right decision" by adding Utah and Colorado instead of Utah and BYU. I do understand why the Pac-12 opted to go that route when you also factor in the "No Sunday" and "secular" issues.

(In response to this post by Maroon Baboon)

Posted: 04/18/2021 at 11:21PM



+0

Insert a Link

Enter the title of the link here:


Enter the full web address of the link here -- include the "http://" part:


Current Thread:
 
  
I think the answer..... -- 2hhoop3 04/05/2021 11:35AM
  BYU has real value ** -- CrystalCoveHokie 04/16/2021 11:49AM
  Only if the Pac 12 says it does -- Tailgate Guru 04/16/2021 8:13PM
  WRT to BYU being "geographically isolated," the Big XII -- VTHokie2000 04/18/2021 3:21PM
  BYU would have been a better add for the Pac-12 than Utah. -- Maroon Baboon 04/18/2021 5:11PM
  I meant BYU instead of Utah. -- Maroon Baboon 04/18/2021 11:32PM
  The ACC really has little options that are viable. -- goldendomer 04/15/2021 4:54PM
  The ACC and BigXII are bastardized conferences. -- Maroon Baboon 04/18/2021 12:36AM
  I think the reality..... -- 2hhoop3 04/19/2021 11:26AM
  Not really sure..... -- 2hhoop3 04/16/2021 10:36AM

Tech Sideline is Presented By:

Our Sponsors

vm307